FRINGE TALK

Random thoughts from the Fringe Zone

 

Late-night thoughts on topics of random curiosity.....

JFK?
November 22, 2013

 

Alright, we passed the 50th milestone, and JFK is still dead. I am making these comments, and then not talking any more about the topic until the 75th.

The last several days I have thought a lot about those days and how they affected the country. Over the years I have read many books on the topic, listened to many interviews and in general wondered what really happened. In the end I do not know any more than the rest of you, but I do have a few opinions. I have formed these opinions slowly, with much thought over many years. I am not here to convince you of my opinion. I only wish to present my general thought process. Make up your own mind, I care not a whit what you believe on the topic!

First, I DO NOT believe anything in the Warren Commission Report. It is just so full of flaws, and was pulled together by so many bad actors that it cannot possibly be ANYTHING but a work of pure fiction.

Second, I do very much believe it was an organized conspiracy. There are many theories about who conspired and what their motives were, and in some ways it is largely a case of "ya pays your money and takes your choice"!

Kennedy was not the popular President many believe he was. He was strongly hated by many groups. Some of these are:

 

Hard-core right-wing oil men Hated Kennedy!    The CIA Hated Kennedy!

Organized Crime hated Kennedy!                           Big Labor hated Kennedy!

Military contractors hated Kennedy!                     Madam Nhu (S. Vietnam) Hated Kennedy!

The Soviets hated Kennedy!                                     Cuban exiles hated Kennedy!

Castro hated Kennedy!                                              LBJ Hated Kennedy!

 

Conspiracy theories waft around all these players, and maybe a few more besides. That there was a conspiracy is, I think, indisputable. The Lone Gunman's dog just does not hunt. But which group? Or was it a combination of two or more? I believe the latter!

I think the most credible comments on the conspiracy idea came from the deathbed "confession" of E. Howard Hunt, and what he called "The Big Event". Not saying I accept it unreservedly, just that of the theories out there, it seems the most credible. I give it credibility for four reasons.

 

(1) Hunt was dying, and had no reason to lie. Deathbed tales are generally given credence in our legal system

(2) Jackie Kennedy, being of French descent, was on close terms with the French. She asked French Intelligence to look into the matter. They did, and their reports are now declassified.

(3) When the Soviet Union fell, KGB files became available. Both the KGB and the French analysis agree.

(4) Who benefited the most from JFK's death?

 

Q.E.D.

 

Third, there are many good books on the topic. Two conspiracy books I recommend are the recent tome by Jerome Corsi and the one by Roger Stone. I also recommend "Texas In The Morning" by long-time LBJ mistress and baby-mama Madeline Duncan Brown. There is also insight to be gained by reading the massive four volume biography set by LBJ biographer Robert Carrow.

Finally, there is an excellent UK production "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" that was never allowed to air in this country, but which is now on Youtube. Oliver Stone's movie JFK is seriously flawed, but worth a look anyway. A player in the assassination drama was Billy Sol Estes, who is mostly overlooked. He should be looked at more closely, I think. Roger Stone does so in his book. I recommend paying close attention to that part.

In the end, we may not know definitively who killed Kennedy. We may never know. However if one carefully studies the materials referenced above you will at least fully understand the complexity of the drama, and be entitled to express an informed opinion.

 

Having pontificated on the topic on Facebook now, I hope to not have to think about politicians with TLA's instead of names again until the 75th comes round. See you again in 2038.

01

Ugly Politics?
October 18, 2012

 

After the second 2012 presidential debate, a good friend of mine sent me a note echoing a sentiment I have heard many others express from time to time. He described the candidates as playing a “King of the Hill” game, and expressed disdain that the contest seemed to get uglier and uglier, concluding with the statement that “We are all the losers for it”

 

After a moment's thought I wrote him this response.....

======

 

You know, I hear this sort of sentiment from so many these days, but I am not sure I can really agree.  In fact as I think about it, I have a very differing opinion...


Politics, by it's very nature is a "blood sport".  Champions of opposing ideologies are always going to be at each others throats, that is the nature of the beast.  That is unavoidable so long as we are human beings.  In fact strike that "human" part, as no other life form is going to be better, unless you would care to bring angels into the discussion, and I have never seen an Angel or talked to anyone who convincingly claimed to have done so.  Yet even in many accounts that purport to describe the lives of Angels, they have their politics too.  Read Heinlein's JOB, for one example. Or go to the source, and read Isaiah's description of how Lucifer became a fallen angel. Yeah, politics is everywhere!

That we are so engaged metaphorically, and not physically is perhaps modern man's greatest achievement!  This should be CELEBRATED, not disdained.

Wishing it would all go away, sighing and wailing over the competitive nature of the sport accomplishes nothing.  This is exactly how it SHOULD be!  What alternative would you prefer?  A totalitarian regime that brutally suppresses all dissent?  Would you prefer that those on the losing side at any given moment, just lose the will to compete and give up?

As I have explained before, the fiction of left-right, red-blue is a false dichotomy and the battle lines are not so clearly drawn. The problem is not the Democrats vs. the Republicans. The problem is the authoritarians vs. the libertarians, where two different flavors of authoritarian square off against the libertarians in a three-sided contest.

 

We endure today a political environment where three groups are squared off in combat.  Two of them are loosely allied against the third, yet still battling each other even as they simultaneously cooperate to block and lock out the third.  Yet if either one of those two allied forces were to attain complete dominance we would surely have that totalitarian regime, and I guarantee you that things would NOT be better for it!

So HELL YES I want the Jeffersonian minority to keep fighting and to keep blocking the progress of the totalitarian-minded.  HELL YES I want the Hamiltonians and the Marxists to keep fighting each other!  HELL YES!!!

As for things continuing to get uglier and uglier, I disagree again.  As confrontational as Tuesday night's debate was it was a love-fest compared to debates of years gone by.  Have you not read history?  The open duels on the floor of Congress?  Burr vs. Hamilton?  Andrew "Old Hickory" Jackson?  [n.b. Did you know that the use of the "Jackass" as the symbol for the Democratic Party stemmed from a political campaign where Jackson was called "Jackass" as a vile play on his name, and he took the epithet and embraced it?]   Calling what is going on today as "getting uglier and uglier" is the voice of ignorance and apathy. This is how civilized man deals with a political disagreement.

Even in more modern times, today's politics seems tame beside some of those of the recent past.  Do you not remember Goldwater?  Reagan?  LBJ?  Kennedy?  Or if you really want violence look at the MacGregors and Campbells!! With three data points, one can plot a curve. Comparing the age of the MacGregors, with the age of Jackson, with the age of today we see a clear trend of less violence in politics, not worse.

I disagree with almost every point you made, my friend, I think we are all the RICHER for an active, vociferous yet civilized political system.  I despise the would-be tyrants following the disciplines of Marx & Engels, and Hamilton, and want to see them ousted, and worse.  But I have no desire to give anyone, of any political persuasion total control and the ability to eliminate dissent.  Even the kindest heart can quickly become a brutal tyrant!

Thank your lucky stars, or what-ever deity you please that we live in a time and place where vociferous political opponents face off on a University campus and not with pistols at dawn!  Thank fortune that the barbs thrown in todays political climate are tipped with words and not cold steel.  We live in a WONDERFUL time, compared to much of history.  The Utopian view pushed by the disciples of Marx and Engels is a deceptive chimera, the route to slavery, and the only peace we will find therein is the peace of the grave. These Utopians will not lead us to either peace or liberty.

My dear friend, you are an educated, intelligent man.  Surely you understand these things.  Surely you speak merely from fatigue, and not the heart....

Is Birthplace Really Relevant?
(or Why the so-called "Birther-movement" has it all wrong!)
August 11, 2014

 

Why do we care whether the current Resident of the White House was born in Hawaii or Kenya?  Simply because only a "Natural Born Citizen" can be President, and some feel he does not qualify.  Does it actually matter, legally, where he was born?

 

The Term "Natural Born Citizen" is a legal one, used in Article 2 of the US Constitution, and one which many legal scholars claim has never been satisfactorily defined by the courts. So what did that phrase mean to Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton and the rest of the Framers? What was, in 1775, the commonly accepted definition of “Natural Born Citizen”? We shall have to delve deeper into documents the Framers might have referenced to form an opinion.

 

One of the reference materials they used is Vattel's “Laws of Nations” published in 1757. We know this because Thomas Jefferson said so, in other writings. Vattel does simply and explicitly define the term. “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

 

Notice that phrase “OF PARENTS (PLURAL) WHO ARE CITIZENS”!!

 

This topic is revisited several times in the coming years. In 1787 future Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Jay, penned a letter to George Washington using the same phraseology in an argument against ever allowing anyone but a “Natural Born Citizen” to be Commander-in-chief of the US Military.

 

We are told, notably by Wikipedia, that the Supreme Court has never ruled on the definition of Natural Born Citizen. This is not quite accurate.

 

In 1875, the SCOTUS stated “At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

Again, note the terminology, “OF PARENTS (PLURAL) WHO WERE CITIZENS” almost verbatim from Vattel.

 

Another SCOTUS opinion in 1814 states “The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.” Again, note the terminology.

 

Another SCOTUS opinion, in 1898 states “it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens,”

 

Clearly, the SCOTUS of the 19th century knew what a “Natural born Citizen” was. These examples are but a few of the many on the topic, and there are other examples of source materials considered by the framers that agreed.

 

In 2012 I wrote an essay on the topic.  In that essay, I concluded that there are three classes of citizen, or more precisely a general class of Citizen, and two sub-classes (1) Naturalized Citizen, and (2) Natural Born Citizen.  It seems pretty clear that one could be a citizen and not a member of either sub-class, but the strongest, purist form of Citizen was the Natural Born Citizen.

 

Someone born in this country to recent immigrants, for example, would be a citizen, but if either parent were not yet a naturalized citizen, the child would not attain that “Natural Born” sub-class. In most day-to-day dealings the three distinctions were interchangeable, a distinction without a difference, but to become POTUS one must be that last, strongest and purist sub-class of Citizen, the Natural Born Citizen.

 

Despite these 19th Century case law examples, many argue that the term "Natural Born Citizen" has never been defined.  If the 19th Century rulings are followed, he cannot be considered a Natural Born Citizen.  Many however argue that by being born in Hawaii, to an American mother, he meets the qualifications.

 

But does he?

 

Well, right from the start, we must recognize that his presumed father Barack Obama Sr. was definitely NOT an American Citizen.  If his father must be a citizen in order to confer "Natural Born" status, then he fails of qualification immediately.  Let us set that aside for a moment and examine his mother.  His mother was a citizen, right?

 

Well, yes, but when a Citizen births a child with a foreign non-citizen, there are specific legal requirements in place from the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 that govern whether or not the child is considered a citizen of one country or the other.  Let's look at the text of this law:

 

”When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to birth of the child with FIVE of the years after the age of 14.”  This law has been changed numerous times over the years, and there are many variants with different wordings, but this is the wording as near as I can find, in the early 1960's.

 

Simple, Interesting, and if accurate, problematical...

 

Ms. Dunham was only 18 at most, thus technically did not meet the legal requirement to confer citizenship on her son, thus he was technically a citizen of his father's country, NOT THE US! Beyond the fact that she was a minor, only age 18 or less, some claim she had in fact left the country traveling to Kenya with the baby's father prior to the birth. I am not certain this is true however, as the father does not seem to have made that trip. There is a lot of mystery around Senior that may involve the CIA and British Intelligence.   So if true, even if she had been of age, she still did not meet the residency requirement.  If that was not the case, she still was a minor.  Either way he is a citizen of Kenya, and not of the US, if the elder Barack Obama is in fact his father.

 

That would seem to be kind of a problem, no matter WHERE he was born, Hawaii, Kenya or anywhere else. Thus, if the verbiage of the law in effect at the time of his birth is as I understand it (It HAS changed many times over the years) the man's birthplace is irrelevant!  His mother was not the determinent of his citizenship.  His father was.  Therefore, he was born a citizen of Kenya, and a British subject, regardless where he was born!  This might even explain many mysteries his harsher critics have raised. 

Not that anyone actually cares....

04

02

Bigfoot DNA?

Purported Bigfoot DNA samples have created a bit of a stir

September 2, 2014

 

The essence of Science is to be open-minded and curious. Which is why I am always a little bit mystified by so-called "Mainstream Science" and the way otherwise very scientifically minded professionals can be so very closed-minded, even vicious, when confronted with something outside their accepted paradigm.
I, for one, have never believed in the eponymous "Big Foot" creature, "Sasquatch" or "Yeti" or whatever name you prefer. Yet legends persist throughout aboriginal cultures the world over.  I have suspected that maybe, just maybe there might be "Feral Humans" around, people who were really pretty much as human as you and I (Well, me anyway, some of you Facebook people give me pause) but for whatever happenstance lived in the wild, avoiding contact with humanity. There are vast swaths of unpopulated lands (Daniel Boone National Forest being one close to my home stomping grounds) where such "forest people" could effectively hide. Of course my ideas were given flight by a couple of "X-Files Episodes" but it always seemed a reasonable hypothesis to me.

 

So, anyway, one DNA Researcher volunteered to do DNA analysis of some purported "Bigfoot" samples. When the results came back as Human, but only "sort-of", she found herself under assault from both the "Bigfoot Community" on one side, and "Mainstream Science" on the other.

 

Dr. Melba Ketchum has seen her reputation trashed and her career nearly destroyed for daring to perform real, honest science outside the carefully structured walls of scientific orthodoxy. The attacks from both sides have been extraordinarily vicious.

 

Frankly, as a bit of a scientific dilettante myself, I am fascinated by her reported results, and appalled at the way she has been treated. I lay no claim as to the veracity of her claims, or the validity of her research, only that to my eye it seems to pass the "smell test" and not be an obvious hoax and fraud, like the guy who tried to pass off Raccoon entrails as bigfoot DNA. Perhaps she will be ultimately vindicated, or proven a fraud. I do not know, but I do know that the reaction of her fellow scientists is way over the top.

 

Meanwhile, if you encounter a "Bigfoot" in the wilderness, probably best not to shoot it. It could be a man dressed up in a fur suit to perpetuate another of the endless hoaxes, but if it should be a real "Bigfoot" Dr. Ketchum says they are HUMAN! Mostly...., and that she strongly believes they are also "People", whatever that really means in this context.


Check out her work for yourself and make up your own mind. I think it is fascinating...

03

Test

Chromosome Quest

Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;

 

Chromosome Quest

Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;

Chromosome Quest

Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;

Chromosome Quest

Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;

Chromosome Quest

Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;

Chromosome Quest

Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ; Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;Chromosome Quest ;